Saturday, January 10, 2015

Opportunity Knocking: How Will the GSU/GPC Merger Affect Dunwoody?

A few days ago, Fran Millar posted on his Facebook page a news article about Georgia State University absorbing Georgia Perimeter College.  He posted in his comment that he thought the merger was a good idea.  Fiscally, it is, at least for GPC.  There financial troubles are no secret to anyone, including their own student body.

But when there is a hint of any institution expanding in Dunwoody, the first criticism is always about traffic and that was my immediate response to Fran.

Historically, GPC's leadership hasn't given any indication they care for a second how they impact the through traffic or communities around Dunwoody so it's natural to assume the worst.

Then I read the news articles and press releases

Reporter Newspaper

AJC

Q&A with Georgia State Prez

Q&A with Board of Regents

That last one is the most interesting.  Here's Question #3

Will any campuses be closed? 
The consolidation implementation team will be assessing the needs and infrastructure of the new consolidated institution. The consolidation team’s final report to the Board will include a recommendation about campus structure and locations.

Way back when Dunwoody was researching its populace for ideas on branding  the community surveys or "wish lists" had numerous segments of the population wishing they could close the Dunwoody GPC campus.  Our city government cannot take that initiative:  GPC is a state institution (see above re:  not giving a damn what we think) and they're going to pack students in their land like sardines, dammit, and who cares if all the classes let out at once and immobilize the streets?

But there's a new head honcho in charge of the GPC campuses.  There's a chance for a fresh start.  Dunwoody's mysterious "Town and Gown" committee has a chance to improve this campus' interaction with the community.

If the above quote from the Regents' Q&A is to be believed at face value, there's even a chance that GSU won't need that campus anymore and there's even a chance - however slight - they would want to dispose of it.

So my initial reaction to Fran's post may not necessarily be the most accurate.  There's a possibility that the new GSU will fail to care any more than the smaller GPC did and continue to pack its campus with increasing enrollment and traffic.  But there's also a possibility that GSU's leadership may be more willing to compromise with Dunwoody about activities on that campus.  There's even a possibility that the poll respondents from 2011 will get their wish and the location will close.

So now is the time for Dunwoody's officials, especially the Town and Gown committee to get on the stick and get a meeting with GSU's leadership and consolidation team.  Now is the time to make serious decisions about what Dunwoody wants for that campus - no more shoot-from-the-lip wish lists.  Real decisions made on real analysis of potential outcomes of each scenario, both positive and negative.  (FWIW, there would be no impact on Dunwoody's tax base:  the campus is state land and therefore not taxed.)  If Dunwoody wants activities adjusted to lessen congestion, or if they want the campus closed (and made available to a city that has civic needs of its own and has an eye toward its own school district....) then that outreach from City Hall to GSU needs to start yesterday.

1 comment:

Greg said...

DWG:

I don't think it fair to construe the GPC as being indifferent to the issues of traffic and parking. A few years back, GPC proposed a MasterPlan that showed a parking garage for 1300 cars that would have kept all cars on-campus, and not in neighborhood streets.

GPC is not responsibile for the two-lane roads that serve its location. That's a City of Dunwoody issue, pure and simple. Dunwoody accepted responsibility for improving the roads when we incorporated.

If our City wants to be responsible, we should take the lead in at least three areas:

1) Widen/improve Womack Road toward Dunwoody Elementary and work with the college to move the student entrance to the area formerly occupied by the industrial arts bldg.

2) Improve the Womak/Tilly Mill/Tillingham Ct. intersection for longer left-turn lanes and incorporation of Tillingham Ct. into a signal-controlled intersection.

3) Improve the access to I-285 by improving the N. Peachtree, Tilly Mill, and Peeler intersections, as well as revisiting the Womack/Vermack intersection. GPC students already "know" that you can use Womack to Vermack to get to Chamblee Dunwoody and I-285 as an alternate to Tilly Mill to N. Peachtree or to P'Tree Industrial. Improving intersections and signal timing would be of great help to handling the traffic burden.